Skip to main content

Functional Assessment Checklist: Teachers and Staff

The Functional Assessment Checklist: Teachers and Staff (FACTS; March, Horner, Lewis-Palmer, Brown, Crone, & Todd, 1999) is a semi-structured brief interview method used to conduct a functional assessment or develop an intervention plan for individual students.

Available from the Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports

Overview

The Functional Assessment Checklist: Teachers and Staff (FACTS; Anderson & Borgmeier, 2007 from March, Horner, Lewis-Palmer, Brown, Crone, & Todd,1999) is a semi-structured brief interview method used to conduct a functional assessment or develop an intervention plan for individual students. Within the Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) model, the FACTS helps with tertiary-level support development. Informants are provided with response choices or can provide their own responses. The FACTS, which consists of two parts, can be completed in approximately 5 to 15 minutes.

Summary

Age: N/A

Time to Administer: 5-15 minutes

Method of Administration: The interview results in a summary of behavior and related targets to support behavior change

Subscales: Sections: Student Strengths/Contributions; Problem Behaviors; Routines/Likelihood of Problem Behavior; Priorities for Behavior Support; Antecedents/Triggers and Setting Events; Consequences/Maintaining Events and Features

Autism Related Research

McIntosh et al. (2008)

Age Range: N/A - review of studies using the FACTS to identify psychometric properties

Sample Size: 10 research studies

Topics Addressed:

Psychometric properties of the FACTS, including for students with autism

Outcome:McIntosh et al. (2008)

Results derived from 10 research studies using the FACTS indicate strong evidence of test-retest reliability and interobserver agreement, moderate to strong evidence of convergent validity with direct observation and functional analysis procedures, strong evidence of treatment utility, and strong evidence of social validity.

Conclusion: though indirect methods of FBA are not as strong as direct processes, they are more efficient and the FACT appears to be a technically sound approach to completing FBAs indirectly.